Auditing dApps requires a wide skill set. It takes hands-on experience with common smart contract vulnerability classes, familiarity with widely used DeFi frameworks and design patterns (Uniswap/Aave-style architectures), and active engagement with the security community to stay current as best practices evolve.

Before we dive into code, we align on the threat model: MEV searchers, oracle manipulators, privileged roles, governance attackers, frontend risks, and the trust assumptions your system makes. This is often where teams are unintentionally overconfident.

Understanding what the protocol is *trying* to do is where audits are won or lost. In our audit work, a significant share of high-severity findings stem from protocol-specific logic errors: edge cases where the code is internally consistent but violates the system’s intended behavior. These issues are unique to each dApp.

Security is rarely isolated to a single contract. We review integrations, privilege boundaries, upgrade mechanisms, cross-chain dependencies, frontend assumptions, and external infrastructure, because systems often fail at the seams—not just inside individual functions.

Building secure dApps is a discipline that starts at design and continues through deployment and beyond an audit. That’s why we focus on identifying core protocol invariants, making them explicit, checking them during manual review, and translating them into properties we can validate with fuzzing. This helps teams remediate faster and ship with confidence.