Auditing EVM smart contracts requires a wide skill set. It takes hands-on experience with common vulnerability classes, familiarity with widely used DeFi frameworks and patterns (Uniswap/Aave-style design choices), and active engagement with the security community to stay current as best practices evolve.

Before we dive into code, we align on the threat model: MEV searchers, oracle manipulators, privileged roles, governance attackers, and the trust assumptions your system makes, since this is often where teams are unintentionally overconfident.

That last point, understanding what the protocol is trying to do, is where audits are won or lost. In our audit work, a large share of high-severity findings come from protocol-specific logic errors: edge cases where the code is internally consistent but violates the system’s intended behavior. These are always unique to your protocol.

Security is rarely isolated to a single contract. We review integrations, privilege boundaries, and external dependencies, because systems often fail at the seams, not just inside functions.

Building safe code is a discipline that starts at design and continues through deployment and beyond an audit. That’s why we focus on the core invariants of each protocol, making them explicit, checking them during manual review, and turning them into properties we can validate with fuzzing. This helps teams remediate faster and ship with confidence.